 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Take Advantage of Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donloper.com/advertising-and-marketing/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donloper.com/advertising-and-marketing/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sandberg</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/advertising-and-marketing/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg.html/comment-page-1#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sandberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>From my experience it actually only takes about 30-50 diggs for a story to be promoted to the homepage, but they all need to be within about a 24 hr time period, before a new story leaves the upcoming section. Once a story leaves the upcoming section it will never reach the hompage no matter how many Diggs it gets. Also, stories can be removed if enough users bury it, so even if you get 300 people to digg your story if Digg users smell something fishy they will bury it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience it actually only takes about 30-50 diggs for a story to be promoted to the homepage, but they all need to be within about a 24 hr time period, before a new story leaves the upcoming section. Once a story leaves the upcoming section it will never reach the hompage no matter how many Diggs it gets. Also, stories can be removed if enough users bury it, so even if you get 300 people to digg your story if Digg users smell something fishy they will bury it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad McCall</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/advertising-and-marketing/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg.html/comment-page-1#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad McCall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>I kept on seeing &quot;digg it&quot; on multiple blogs, and joined digg a while back to check it out. (Though I still have yet to integrate the feature into my blogs) One of the first articles I wanted to digg myself was from my blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tweetsweet.com/blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tweet Sweet&lt;/a&gt; about chocolate. But do you think I could find a place to put anything related to food? Nope. And how about digging posts relating to Graphic Design, Branding, or even Art in general? (Stuff I blog about on my main blog) What about Real Estate or Home Improvement? Where do those go? It seems that digg&#039;s categories are catered toward the web geek or sports junkie, and not for a general Internet audience. (Technology and Sports have the most sub-categories) It would be nice to see a few more sub-categories incorporated into the site, I think they&#039;re especially missing categories in the non-science and non-techie areas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept on seeing &#8220;digg it&#8221; on multiple blogs, and joined digg a while back to check it out. (Though I still have yet to integrate the feature into my blogs) One of the first articles I wanted to digg myself was from my blog <a href="http://www.tweetsweet.com/blog">Tweet Sweet</a> about chocolate. But do you think I could find a place to put anything related to food? Nope. And how about digging posts relating to Graphic Design, Branding, or even Art in general? (Stuff I blog about on my main blog) What about Real Estate or Home Improvement? Where do those go? It seems that digg&#8217;s categories are catered toward the web geek or sports junkie, and not for a general Internet audience. (Technology and Sports have the most sub-categories) It would be nice to see a few more sub-categories incorporated into the site, I think they&#8217;re especially missing categories in the non-science and non-techie areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Passehl</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/advertising-and-marketing/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg.html/comment-page-1#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Passehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree that Digg isn&#039;t quite what it used to be. I wrote an article that made it to the top page of Reddit.com but I only recieved about 30 Diggs so I see where your coming from. Digg is no longer about the little guy. It&#039;s becomeing more of a corporate sales pitch that a bloggers dream.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree that Digg isn&#8217;t quite what it used to be. I wrote an article that made it to the top page of Reddit.com but I only recieved about 30 Diggs so I see where your coming from. Digg is no longer about the little guy. It&#8217;s becomeing more of a corporate sales pitch that a bloggers dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay M</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/advertising-and-marketing/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg.html/comment-page-1#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/how-to-take-advantage-of-digg#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  It&#039;s a shame that Digg has because such a target for manipulation, but I guess that&#039;s the price you pay for being as popular as Digg.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  It&#8217;s a shame that Digg has because such a target for manipulation, but I guess that&#8217;s the price you pay for being as popular as Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

