 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questionable Reliability of Google AdWords Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donloper.com/search-engine-marketing/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donloper.com/search-engine-marketing/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bascom</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/search-engine-marketing/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics.html/comment-page-1#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bascom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics#comment-733</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no way Google is manipulating the system. I think Josh&#039;s guess about some kind of auto search bot is much more likely. It could be someone using Web Position or similar software to check their site&#039;s ranking, or someone screen-scaping, or I&#039;ve even heard rumors of people doing this type of thing to screw with competitors&#039; click through rates while their own ads are paused, but who knows? One thing I&#039;m fairly certain of is that it&#039;s not due to a sudden interest in &quot;utah website design&quot; especially since you didn&#039;t get a single click from all those searches.

I see weird numbers like this much more often from Yahoo than Google, but a lot of times the Yahoo numbers include a bunch of useless (non-converting) clicks as well. Whenever I call Yahoo on it, they look into it and come back to say, &quot;oh, no, they&#039;re legitimate clicks.&quot; But usually end up refunding part of it as a &quot;courtesy.&quot; Consider yourself lucky that none of those nasty little bots clicked on your ads.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no way Google is manipulating the system. I think Josh&#8217;s guess about some kind of auto search bot is much more likely. It could be someone using Web Position or similar software to check their site&#8217;s ranking, or someone screen-scaping, or I&#8217;ve even heard rumors of people doing this type of thing to screw with competitors&#8217; click through rates while their own ads are paused, but who knows? One thing I&#8217;m fairly certain of is that it&#8217;s not due to a sudden interest in &#8220;utah website design&#8221; especially since you didn&#8217;t get a single click from all those searches.</p>
<p>I see weird numbers like this much more often from Yahoo than Google, but a lot of times the Yahoo numbers include a bunch of useless (non-converting) clicks as well. Whenever I call Yahoo on it, they look into it and come back to say, &#8220;oh, no, they&#8217;re legitimate clicks.&#8221; But usually end up refunding part of it as a &#8220;courtesy.&#8221; Consider yourself lucky that none of those nasty little bots clicked on your ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Steimle</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/search-engine-marketing/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics.html/comment-page-1#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Steimle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics#comment-732</guid>
		<description>It seems highly unlikely. If they were it wouldn&#039;t be hard for evidence of it to get out and that kind of thing could cost them billions. It&#039;s in their best interests for everything to be accurate. Plus they don&#039;t get paid anything for impressions, only for clicks, and I&#039;m not getting any clicks which is what is so weird. However, I still have no idea what&#039;s going on.

Today there have been 128 impressions so far with zero clicks. I&#039;m wondering if there&#039;s just a bug somewhere in their system somewhere.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems highly unlikely. If they were it wouldn&#8217;t be hard for evidence of it to get out and that kind of thing could cost them billions. It&#8217;s in their best interests for everything to be accurate. Plus they don&#8217;t get paid anything for impressions, only for clicks, and I&#8217;m not getting any clicks which is what is so weird. However, I still have no idea what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Today there have been 128 impressions so far with zero clicks. I&#8217;m wondering if there&#8217;s just a bug somewhere in their system somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Page</title>
		<link>http://www.donloper.com/search-engine-marketing/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics.html/comment-page-1#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.47.194.140/uncategorized/questionable-reliability-of-google-adwords-metrics#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Any chance google is manipulating the system to charge more for ads?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance google is manipulating the system to charge more for ads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

